Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Paret, 1986)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

MOMSParet.jpg

28 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Mandatory Reading for Army Staff Majors, March 12, 2002
By  S. Miska (Germany)
 
As the title indicates, the Army's Command & General Staff College requires students to read Makers of Modern Strategy in the core history class. Professors can make best use of this book as a supplement. As other reviewers have noted, the chapters are disjointed with each other. Taken separately, however, many of the chapters help the history student or enthusiast to develop a depth of understanding on a particular subject. Authors such as John Shy, Douglas Porch, Michael Howard, and Condoleeza Rice, just to name a few, explore many of the strategic issues involved with the evolution of military thought.
 
From Machiavelli and Clausewitz to strategies of world wars and colonial wars, Makers of Modern Strategy adds value to any serious study of warfare. The high quality academic research and thought that underlies many of the articles is worth the price of the book. Highly recommended.

p.110 In marching, according to Guibert's conception, each division constitutes a column. These columns, in separating on the march, move more rapidly, cover a wider theater, and force the enemy to turn in a desired direction; for battle they concentrate, never having lost the higher unity that makes them a single army... Battle becomes more flexible than before... Guibert credits Frederick [the Great] with having used such a system at Hohenfriedberg
 
p.131 Napoleon believed that the best method of reaching whatever political goal he sought was to reduce his opponent's power of resistance to the greatest extent possible.
 
p.146 [Jomini insisted] on the validity of the same basic ideas, first set down in 1803:
That strategy is the key to warfare;
That all strategy is controlled by invariable scientific principles; and
That these principles prescribe offensive action to mass forces against weaker enemy forces at some decisive point if strategy is to lead to victory.
 
p.165 Central to Jomini's argument that there are immutable "principles" of war... is his emphasis on "lines of operations."
 
p.167 But even the [Jomini] term "accidental lines of operations" contains a vital point: in warfare the unexpected must be expected - rapidly changing circumstances might require a new line of operations.
 
p.168 In Jomini's judgment... most commanders made the wrong choices because they did not understand the principles of strategy. Those principles can be summarized in the fewest words as bringing superior force to bear on a point where the enemy is both weaker and liable to crippling damage.

Enter supporting content here