Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Business Planning for Turbulent Times (Ramirez, Selsky, van der Heijden, 2008, 2010)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

New Methods for Applying Scenarios

RamirezBPFTT.jpg

The world is increasingly turbulent and complex, awash with disruptions, tipping points and knock-on effects exemplified by the implosion of financial markets and economies around the globe.
 
This book is for business and organizational leaders who want and need to think through how best to deal with increasing turbulence, and with the complexity and uncertainty that come with it. The authors explain in clear language how future orientation and, specifically, modern scenario techniques help to address these conditions. They draw on examples from a wide variety of international settings and circumstances including large corporations, inter-governmental organizations, small firms and municipalities. Readers will be inspired to try out scenario approaches themselves to better address the turbulence that affects them and others with whom they work, live and do business. This second edition extends the use of scenarios planning and methods to tackle the risk and uncertainty of financial markets and the potentially massive impacts on businesses of all kinds, providing powerful tools to give far thinking executives an advantage in these turbulent times.

p.44 since the level of uncertainty in turbulent environments is not predictable, planned courses of action must be oriented towards values and ideals giving sense and coherence in a commonly agreed upon direction.
 
p.51 Checkland also challenged the assumption that human activity is goal-seeking. Influenced by Geoffrey Vickers's work, he adopted the premise that the maintenance and constant balancing of relationships in a system was a more fruitful basis for examining problem-solving behaviour in organizations.
 
p.167 Scholars have begun to search for effective responses that organizations might mobilize to... remain resilient. In short, resilience, along with agility, has become essential for absorbing and responding to disruptive change.
 
p.172 Complexity theory tells us that whole systems with dense connections among the parts exhibit behaviours that cannot be predicted from understanding the parts and their direct interactions... The tight connectivity of complex systems increases the likelihood that a disruption in one system or part of a system may jump a system boundary and produce 'synchronous failure'... or a cascading series of unexpected events
 
p.220 It is now almost 25 years since Pierre Wack (1985a, 1985b) wrote his two seminal articles reflecting on his experience of scenario planning. He was arguing that planning should be based on an understanding of predetermined elements rather than best guesses. Wack's thinking was... based on... a sound understanding of the reality that we cannot always see. The challenge is to make the hidden visible, and the knowable known and understandable.
 
p.284-285 Scenarios can be considered a method with which to engage some aspect of reality... It appears to us scenario methods, like other practitioners' crafts, lie largely outside the canons of classic or social science.
 
p.291 One day, complexity theory may teach us that the story of systems and/or fields at an actual bifurcation point can only be told in retrospect - that strategizing around such a point prospectively is impossible. Consider the role of scenarios at such a point: they might be able to take plausible bifurcations into account in advance, but not be able to predict which road the system will actually take at the bifurcation since this is irreducible uncertainty and therefore unknowable.

Enter supporting content here