Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Simple Chess (Emms, 2001)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

mastering the basic principles

simplechessemms.jpg

Chess is an easy game to learn, but a difficult one to master. A study of tactical play and some practical experience can get a player to a standard where they are skillful enough to prevent both checkmate and material loss. However, to advance from here to a higher level it is necessary to tackle positional play. This can appear daunting. However, once the principal strategic ideas are recognized, then everything becomes clearer and the game becomes simpler. In this book Grandmaster and experienced chess writer John Emms provides the improving player with the fundamental knowledge required to enter very game with confidence. This book offers a complete introduction to chess strategy, important positional ideas and is ideal for club and tournament players. (6 x 9, 144 pages, diagrams)

p.1 In the beginning, I, like many others, found chess to be a simple game... Suddenly my next plateau was reached - my more experienced opponents wouldn't fall for any of my tricks anymore. Worse than this, they were slowly but surely grinding me down to defeat with something called "positional chess"... This book is aimed as an introduction to positional chess
 
p.7 Assuming we have a material balance in a position, then one of the most important features is the relative activity of the pieces. There can be an advantage for one side if he has one piece which is performing several useful functions at the same time. On the other hand, a side can be severely disadvantaged if one of his pieces is not pulling his or her weight.
 
p.30 On this occasion, however, there is one overriding feature of the position - the awful placement of Black's knight on b7.

Miralles
Miralles.jpg
Emms, black to move

In this respect the white pawns on b4 and d5 are doing a grand job, not allowing the knight to re-enter the game... With the knight on b7, Black has a long-term positional disadvantage. Such small positional details can be vitally important when assessing positions. 
 
p.63 doubled pawns... can be weak in two different ways. The first of these is that they can be vulnerable to attack... The second weakness is that they can decrease the mobility of a pawn formation.
 
p.64 The main problems for White, however, [diagram below, Black to move] are his static weaknesses, including the miserable set of doubled and isolated c-pawns.

Parker
ShneiderParker1999.jpg
Shneider

Not only are they vulnerable to attack, they are completely immobile and they also leave gaps around the white king. Added to this, Black's knight has already found itself a great outpost on c5, where it is completely invulnerable to white pawns.
 
p.67 So far we've only looked at the negative side of [doubled] pawns, but there are some positives too. Doubled pawns, especially ones... in the center, can control vital squares... Another positive feature is that the creation of doubled pawns automatically produces an open file for the possessor of the doubled pawns. This can be good news for the activity of the rooks.
    Naturally each position has to be considered on its own merits, before deciding whether the doubled pawns are a weakness, a strength, or just plain irrelevant.
 
p.70 isolated pawns are much more easily attacked if they stand on a half open file as the attacker can simply move his rooks to this file and the pawn is under threat. Even when the pawn can be adequately defended, the fact that the possessor of the isolated pawn has to use pieces to defend it means that he will be passively placed for operations on other parts of the board.
 
p.125 In Simple Chess [a different book by a different author with the same name as this book], Michael Stean talked of "space" and "capacity" in a way that was quite enlightening to me. His words were, 'Any given pawn structure has a certain capacity for accommodating pieces efficiently. Exceed this capacity and the pieces get in each other's way, and so reduce their mutual activity. The problem of overpopulation is easy to sense when playing a position - it 'feels' cramped.'

Enter supporting content here