Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

10 Rules for Strategic Innovators (Govindarajan, Trimble, 2005)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

10-Innovation-Rules.jpg

From Publishers Weekly
By burying their titular 10 rules in a small final chapter, Govindarajan and Trimble commit the first deadly sin of business writing: ambiguity. Before that, readers can be forgiven for believing there are only three fundamental principles for stewarding innovative projects within established companies: forgetting, borrowing and learning. The Fast Company columnists, who cofounded a leadership institute at Dartmouth's business school, argue that most companies do not understand how to foster a genuinely experimental environment. Judging the new company ("NewCo") by the performance standards of the core company ("CoreCo") won't inspire change, hence the need to forget. But NewCo does have to borrow selectively from CoreCo's best resources in order to gain the foothold necessary for success, and it must learn from its experiences rather than stick blindly to its earliest plans.
 
Govindarajan and Trimble use case studies from four industries, including manufacturing and online media. The examples, supplemented by numerous figures that reduce ideas to clear bullet points, get their points across effectively, but some readers may grow impatient waiting for the promised rules to turn up.

p.30 One of the most powerful elements... is the norm for using predictions in plans as a basis for judging... performance.
 
p.89 The essence of strategic experiments is that much more is unknown than known. No amount of research and planning can resolve the unknowns in advance. The future of an emerging industry is simply unknowable... The winner is not necessarily the company that starts with the best plan. Rather, it is often the one that learns and adapts the quickest.
 
p.103 There is wisdom in the adage, "What gets measured gets done."
 
p.152 A simple tool for communicating cause-and-effect stories is the influence diagram (also called bubble-and-arrow diagrams). The concept is straightforward: by showing an arrow leading from an action to an outcome, the diagram implies a causal connection between them... The influence diagram can be taken one step further to convey subsequent outcomes... Influence diagrams show chains of causality from action to ultimate outcome.
 
p.154 Influence diagrams can grow excessively large. To avoid this, capture in the diagram only the most important elements of how the business is expected to work. Still, for the diagram to be useful, it is best to add a few extra cause-and-effect links that capture important elements of competitor behavior... At minimum, the influence diagram should capture the critical unknowns: elements of the theory of your business that, if incorrect, could radically alter or break it.
 
p.188 Strategic experiments face critical unknowns. No amount of research can resolve these unknowns before the business is launched. Therefore, success depends more on the ability to experiment and learn than on the initial strategy.

Enter supporting content here