Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Thinking and Reasoning in Human Decision Making (P. Facione, N. Facione, 2007)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

The Method of Argument and Heuristic Analysis

Facione.jpg

Review
The Authors show us how to map the flow of the natural language of proponents and consumers of information, how to understand them better. They explain how to translate the process of reasoning into some manageable concept map giving direction within such a map to better understand the problem. It is usually very difficult to propose something new that brilliantly refines tested and proven ways. This Argument & Heuristics Analysis Method enriches our current armamentarium of searches for the best evidence, critical appraisal of evidence in its largest sense and the uses of the best evidence in further rational decision making. Putting into practice its message and testing its uses in various domains of human endeavor will further show its value. I wish these pages good and well- deserved luck! --Milos Jenicek, MD

ix"Over the course of two generations, we have witnessed the unprecedented development of structured, useful, and operational methodologies for modern critical thinking, well adapted to our second millennium ways of practicing it, problem understanding and decision making.
 
x Within the context of heuristics in the health sciences, for example, a busy physician in the midst of a frantic hospital emergency service simply does not have enough time to base his or her decisions on a full blown argumentation and analysis of its building blocks and their interconnections. He or she must make mental shortcuts while preserving the correct essence of clinical problem solving. Algorithms are just one of the decision making tools where appropriate. Researchers in artificial intelligence and computer science face similar problems.
 
p.5 Argument Making is the effort to be logical; that is, to rely on the relevant reasons and facts as we see them when making our decisions... Heuristic Thinking is the tendency, at times quite useful, of relying on cognitive heuristics, which are highly efficient mental maneuvers, to reach a conclusion.  The cognitive maneuvers are as much a part of the human reasoning process as argument making.
 
p.24 Human decision making is not combinatorially exhaustive of every possible option and all foreseeable consequences. Rather, it is, in general, quick and efficient, even if at times mistaken and unwise.
 
p.25 Theories which attempt to explain naturalistic decisions, like the kidney donor example in Chapter 1, describe the interaction of two overlapping systems of reasoning that are active in human decision making. One is often described as reactive, instinctive, quick and holistic (System-1) and the other is more reflective, deliberative, analytical, and procedural (System-2).
 
System-1 thinking is believed to rely heavily on heuristics, key situational cues, and salient memories to arrive quickly and confidently at judgments, particularly when situations are familiar and immediate action is required... System-2 thinking is believed to be useful for judgments in unfamiliar situations, for processing abstract concepts, and for deliberating when there is time for planning and more comprehensive consideration... Both systems are believed to be valuable, simultaneously functioning processes often checking and balancing each other.
 
p.93 reasoning is modeled as the interaction of argument making and heuristic thinking.
 
p.113 Heuristic thinking strategies are ordinarily reliable maneuvers to guide decision making, particularly in familiar contexts. They play larger roles under conditions of uncertainty and in unfamiliar contexts or where the evidence which would support sound arguments and claims is lacking... The first step toward evaluating the influences of heuristic thinking as being able to recognize where and how these strategies are used in human reasoning.
 
p.120 Representativeness - Analogical [section title] Cognitive maneuver: Infer that because X is like Y in some way or other, X is like Y in relevant ways. A perceived similarity becomes the basis for assuming that there is an analogical relationship between two things, an analogy which may or may not be warranted.
 
p.130 Zero-out tendency [section title] Cognitive maneuver: Simplify decision contexts by treating remote probabilities as if they [are] not even possibilities.
 
p.143 To understand fully and to be able to influence individual and group decision making in contexts of risk and uncertainty, we must explore how humans acquire sufficient confidence in a given option such that they discard other possibilities and form the firm intention to act on that option.
 
p.180 The first fundamental way we humans draw reasoned inference is by moving from the more familiar to the less familiar... The second fundamental mode of human reasoning is from broad principles to their applications or to other broad principles which they imply... The third mode of reasoning is from the particulars to generalizations, which in its most refined development is the touchstone for the empirical sciences.

Enter supporting content here