Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Heuristics and Biases (Gilovich, Griffin, Kahneman, 2002)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment

HeuristicsAndBiasesa.jpg

Review
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment; offers a massive, state-of-the-art treatment of the literature, supplementing a similar book published two decades ago...This is an impressive book, full of implications for law and policy." Cass Sunstein, University of Chicago Law School
 
"...the book should serve well as a reference work for researchers in cognitive science and as a textbook for advanced courses in that difficult topic. Philosophers interested in cognitive science will also wish to consult it." Metapsychology Online Review
 
"Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment is a scholarly treat, one that is sure to shape the perspectives of another generation of researchers, teachers, and graduate students. The book will serve as a welcome refresher course for some readers and a strong introduction to an important research perspective for others." Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

v The core idea of the heuristics and biases program is that judgment under uncertainty is often based on a limited number of simplifying heuristics rather than more formal and extensive algorithmic processing. These heuristics typically yield accurate judgments but can give rise to systematic error. Kahneman and Tversky originally identified three such general purpose heuristics - availability, representativeness, and anchoring and adjustment.
 
p.5 The impact of any idea is a product of the quality of the idea itself and the intellectual zeitgeist [JLJ - The word zeitgeist describes the intellectual, cultural, ethical and political climate of an era or also a trend] at the time it was offered. Successful ideas must not only be good, but timely - even lucky.
 
p.22-23 Modern research on categorization of objects and events... has shown that information is commonly stored and processed in relation to mental models, such as prototypes and schemata. It is therefore natural and economical for the probability of an event to be evaluated by the degree to which that event is representative of an appropriate mental model... Representativeness is an assessment of the degree of correspondence between... an instance and a category... When the model and the outcome are described in the same terms, representativeness is reducible to similarity... an outcome is representative of a model if the salient features match or if the model has a propensity to produce the outcome... an attribute is representative of a class if it is very diagnostic
 
p.560-561 bounded rationality suggests designing models specifically to reflect the peculiar properties and limits of the mind and the environment. The decision maker is bounded in time, knowledge, and computational power. In addition, each environment has a variety of irregular informational structures, such as departures from normality... Simon's view of bounded rationality is that of satisficing... Satisficing asserts that our minds have evolved all sorts of nimble tricks to perform well in the quirky structures of the real world.
  The types of models developed by the satisficing view are thus fairly simple
 
p.581 The success of fast and frugal heuristics emphasizes the importance of studying the structure of the information in the environment... Fast and frugal heuristics can be ecologically rational in the sense that they exploit specific and possibly recurrent characteristics of the environment's structure (Tooby & Cosmides, in press). Models of reasonable judgment should look outside of the mind to its environment. And models of reasonableness do not have to forsake accuracy for simplicity - the mind can have it both ways.
 
p.618 The representativeness heuristic consists of the reflexive tendency to assess the "fit" or similarity of objects and events along salient dimensions and to organize them on the basis of one overarching rule: "Like goes with like." The heuristic reflects the belief that a member of a given category ought to resemble the cause that produced it. Thus, the representativeness heuristic is often used to assess whether a given instance belongs to a particular category... Still, the representativeness heuristic is only that - a heuristic. Judgments based on representativeness should therefore be viewed with caution.
 
p.724 Perhaps more importantly, when properly derived, the mathematical features of actuarial methods [JLJ from p.716,  In the clinical method the decision maker combines or processes information in his or her head. In the actuarial or statistical method the human judge is eliminated and conclusions rest solely on empirically established relations between data and the condition or event of interest] ensure that variables contribute to conclusions based on their actual predictive power and relation to the criterion of interest. For example, decision rules based on multiple regression techniques include only the predictive variables and eliminate the nonpredictive ones, and they weight variables in accordance with their independent contribution to accurate conclusions.
 
p.728 The research reviewed in this article indicates that a properly developed and applied actuarial method is likely to help in diagnosing and predicting human behavior as well or better than the clinical method even when the clinical judge has access to equal or greater amounts of information... Although theory and research suggest that the choice of predictive variables is often more important than their weighting, statistical techniques can be used to yield weights that optimize a procedure's accuracy when it is applied to new cases drawn from the same population. Moreover, accuracy can be easily monitored as predictions are made, and methods modified or improved to meet changes in settings and populations. Finally, efforts can be made to test whether new variables enhance accuracy.

Enter supporting content here