Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

The New Economics (Deming, 1994, 2000)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

For Industry, Government, Education, Second Edition

TheNewEconomicsDeming.jpg

". . . competition, we see now, is destructive. It would be better if everyone would work together as a system, with the aim for everybody to win. What we need is cooperation and transformation to a new style of management."

In this book W. Edwards Deming details the system of transformation that underlies the 14 Points for Management presented in Out of the Crisis. The system of profound knowledge, as it is called, consists of four parts: appreciation for a system, knowledge about variation, theory of knowledge, and psychology. Describing prevailing management style as a prison, Deming shows how a style based on cooperation rather than competition can help people develop joy in work and learning at the same time that it brings about long-term success in the market. Indicative of Deming's philosophy is his advice to abolish performance reviews on the job and grades in school.

previously published by MIT-CAES

About the Author
W. Edwards Deming (1900-1993) was an international consultant in quality and productivity management. In 1987 President Ronald Reagan awarded him the National Medal of Technology.

p.17 There is no substitute for knowledge.
 
p.50 A system is a network of interdependent components that work together to try to accomplish the aim of the system. A system must have an aim... The aim must include plans for the future. The aim is a value judgment... Management of a system therefore requires knowledge of the interrelationships between all the components within the system and of the people that work in it... It is management's job to direct the efforts of all components toward the aim of the system.
 
p.51 A system must create something of value, in other words, results.
 
p.54 A system includes the future. Management and leaders have still another job, namely, to govern their own future, not to be merely victims of circumstance.
 
p.55 By understanding a system, one may be able to predict the consequences of a proposed change.
 
p.57 What ignited Japan? The flow diagram shown in figure 6 was the spark that in 1950 and onward turned Japan around. I displayed to top management and to engineers a system in production. The Japanese had knowledge, great knowledge, but it was in bits and pieces, uncoordinated. This flow diagram directed their knowledge and efforts into a system of production, geared to the market - namely, prediction of the needs of customers. The whole world knows about the results.
 
p.58,59 The flow diagram starts with ideas about a possible product or service - what might the customer need; prediction... A flow diagram also assists us to predict what components of the system will be affected, and by how much, as a result of a proposed change in one or more components.
 
p.92 The prevailing style of management must undergo transformation. A system can not understand itself. The transformation requires a view from outside. The aim of this chapter is to provide an outside view - a lens - that I call a system of profound knowledge.
 
p.97 The obligation of any component is to contribute its best to the system, not to maximize its own production, profit, or sales, nor any other competitive measure. Some components may operate at a loss to themselves in order to optimize the whole system, including the components that take a loss.
 
p.100 Management requires knowledge about interaction of forces... Use of data requires knowledge about the different sources of uncertainty.
 
p.100 The interpretation of results of a test or experiment... is prediction that a specific change in a process or procedure will be a wise choice, or that no change would be better. Either way the choice is prediction. This is known as an analytic problem, or a problem of inference, prediction.
 
p.101 Management is prediction. The theory of knowledge helps us to understand that management in any form is prediction.
 
p.102, 103 Knowledge is built on theory. The theory of knowledge teaches us that a statement, if it conveys knowledge, predicts future outcome... Rational prediction requires theory... Theory is a window into the world. Theory leads to prediction... Any rational plan, however simple, is prediction concerning conditions, behavior, performance of people, procedures, equipment, or materials.
 
p.105 An operational definition is [defined as] a procedure agreed upon for translation of concept into measurement of some kind.
 
p.106 information, no matter how complete and speedy, is not knowledge... Knowledge comes from theory. Without theory, there is no way to use the information that comes to us on the instant.
 
p.107 Enlargement of a committee does not necessarily improve results. Enlargement of a committee is not a reliable way to acquire profound knowledge.
 
p.116 Understanding of profound knowledge will lead to transformation of management.

Enter supporting content here