Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

A New Kind of Science (Wolfram, 2002)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

WolframNKOS.jpg

1.0 out of 5 stars Not a good book, October 7, 2008
By  Nikolaos Vasiloglou "just an engineer" (Georgia Tech) -
 
It took 1000 pages to express a simple idea, that simple non-linear structures can create complex structures. Nice illustrations, but nothing novel. I like economy in writing. The author spreads too much. The book doesn't present anything new. It is better if you just read books on chaos and fractals line Fractals Everywhere or Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science.
 
[JLJ a wild intellectual playful rampage, beginning in cellular automata and ending who knows where. Wolfram runs amok and drags his helpless readers through page after page of kaleidoscope images and an encyclopedic Alice-In-Wonderland landscape of concepts, often citing himself as the source of every imaginable branch of complexity science. Not for the faint of heart. After turning a dozen or so pages, you begin to wonder what you can get for this book, if anything, on e-bay.]

p.548 In the traditional sciences, it has rarely been thought necessary to discuss in any explicit kind of way the processes that are involved in perception and analysis. For in most cases all that one studies are rather simple features that can readily be extracted by very straightforward processes... as soon as one tries to investigate behavior of any substantial complexity, the processes of perception and analysis that one needs to use are no longer so straightforward. And the results that one gets can then depend on these processes.
 
p.548 In everyday life we are continually bombarded by huge amounts of data, in the form of images, sounds, and so on. To be able to make use of this data we must reduce it to more manageable proportions. And this is what perception and analysis attempt to do. Their role in effect is to take large volumes of raw data and extract from it summaries that we can use.
 
p.549 There are many forms of perception and analysis... the basic goal in all cases is the same: to reduce raw data to a useful summary form.
  Such a summary is important whenever one wants to... make meaningful extrapolations or predictions based on data.
 
p.557 In everyday language, when we say that something seems complex what we typically mean is that we have not managed to find any simple description of it - or at least those features of it in which we happen to be interested. But the goal of perception and analysis is precisely to find such descriptions, so when we say that something seems complex, what we are effectively saying is that our powers of perception and analysis have failed on it.
 
p.558 In this chapter I argue that essentially all common forms of perception and analysis correspond to rather simple programs.
 
p.632 any method of perception or analysis can at some level be viewed as a way of trying to find simple descriptions for pieces of data... it is rather common for rules that have extremely simple descriptions to give rise to data that is highly complex.

Enter supporting content here