p.4 Resilience is a critical theoretical construct.
p.5 By exploring resilience, we are seeking an answer to the question why
some individuals exposed to risk are able to avoid the negative consequences associated with risk exposure (Christiansen &
Evans, 2005) ... Our view is positive - that each individual possesses the potential for resilience and that
the level of resilience is an outcome of the interplay between the individual and the influencing factors within his
environment. (Tusia & Dyer, 2004). In our view, there is no single source for resilience (Rockville,
1996; Newmann, 2003). That means resilience is not a broad "stable" individual trait (Strumpfer, 2001)... Integral
to the definition of resilience are the interactions among risk and protective factors at an intrapersonal level
and environmental level... Protective factors operate to protect those at risk from the effects of the risk factors...
While risk factors do not automatically lead to negative outcomes, their presence only exposes individuals to circumstances
associated with a higher incidence of the outcome; protective factors contribute to positive outcomes
regardless of the risk status.
p.6 To summarize our underlying concept of resilience:
- Resilience is a dynamic construct that involves developmental change
and progression; it incorporates past and present experiences... and expectations for the future...
- Resilience has a multidimensional character which implies a domain-specific
approach...
- The concept is situated within a holistic framework... we
are in need of an ecological model.
|