p.7 The danger to children lies in the cumulation of adversities
that exist in many families but are evident disproportionately in the poor (Garmezy & Masten, 1994).
p.9 For they point to the far-reaching range of risk research, which embraces a broad band of risk factors
to which children and adults can be exposed - some may eventuate in disease or disorder (which identifies vulnerability),
but others, in many instances, may be overcome and lead to positive adaptive behavior (which identifies resilience).
p. 11 An awareness of the power of chronic and cumulative adversities (Garmezy & Masten, 1994) has now
become evident in at-risk studies.
p.12 If a child or an adult is subjected to stressor upon stressor, negative consequences will follow
(Garmezy & Masten, 1994).
p.16 Garmezy, N., & Masten, A. (1994 pp. 191-208). Chronic adversities. In M. Rutter, L. Hersov, &
E. Taylor (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychiatry (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
p.21 Research on risk and resilience has been guided in recent years by a concern with stress-moderating
processes, a dynamic through which harmful effects of stress are offset by various coping resources. Although this
remains a powerful investigatory model, alternative views of process have recently been advanced, notably the idea of stress
mediation whereby stressors may also function to erode environmental and personal coping resources.
p.25 In sum, the three traditional approaches to stress research - the social structural or family background,
cumulative stressful events, and singular stressors - share a set of limitations involving conceptualization of risk... Assessments
of risk... must be sufficiently exhaustive to make meaningful the idea of resilience
p.26 This approach, as Weaton (1990) has noted, differs from the tradition of coping and stress-buffering
studies described later in this chapter, which focus on individual responses to stress, with the impact of stressors
being influenced by the mobilization of personal and social resources.
p.33 This problem has suggested... considerations in the stressor-support nexus, namely the extent to which
stressors bring about disorder precisely because they alter the availability and efficacy of coping-related resources.
p.56 On the positive side, to understand resilience we must ask not only about the nature of the
individual's responses to stress; in addition, a developmental perspective directs attention to whether and
how protective factors can develop under adversity.
p.101 Resilience refers to the process of, capacity for, or outcome of successful adaptation despite
challenging or threatening circumstances. Psychological resilience is concerned with behavioral adaptation, usually
defined in terms of internal states of well-being or effective functioning in the environment or both. (Masten, Best, &
Garmezy, 1990. p. 426)
p.112 Along with the experience of the [single, stressful event] itself, the associated
accumulation of events contributes to the emergence of psychological resilience or vulnerability.
p.356 As Clark at al. put it, it is the aggregated accumulation of events over time that contributes
to the emergence of psychological resilience or vulnerability in individual cases (see also Garmezy & Masten,
1994).