front flap In many ways, coping is like breathing, an automatic process requiring no apparent effort.
However, when people face truly threatening events - what psychologists call stressors - they become acutely aware of the
coping process and respond by consciously applying their day-to-day coping skills. Coping is a fundamental psychological
process
p.5 a definition [of coping] that encompasses many previous views is that coping is a response aimed
at diminishing the physical, emotional, and psychological burden that is linked to stressful life events and daily hassles...
coping strategies are those responses that are effective in reducing an undesirable "load" (i.e., the psychological
burden). The effectiveness of the coping strategy rests on its ability to reduce immediate distress, as well as to contribute
to more long-term outcomes such as psychological well-being or disease status.
p.6 Is coping always a conscious process? ...we so often may repeatedly respond to a recurring stressor
that we lose our awareness of doing so.
p.9 Lazarus's stress and coping model defined coping as "constantly changing cognitive,
behavioral, [and emotional] efforts to manage particular external and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or
exceeding the resources of the person"
p.9 The centerpiece of the Lazarus and colleagues approach to understanding coping is the notion of how
the person appraises the situation. Appraisal is posited to occur when the perceiver encounters situations that are interpreted
as excessive relative to resources... a person utilizes two levels of appraisals in selecting coping responses. The
first level is primary appraisal, where an individual evaluates whether the situation is potentially harmful... threatening...
blocking a goal, creating a void, or presenting a challenge... When the event is perceived as harmful or threatening,
the individual enters into secondary appraisal, wherein the available resources for coping are examined... the individual
then decides which coping strategies to implement.
p.51 Carver and Scheier (5,6) provided an influential model of self-regulation based on feedback-loop theory
(from 7).
p.105 According to Frijda (81), "emotions can be understood to represent a process of relevance
signaling" (p.113)... Carver and Scheier (82, 83) contended that emotions signal the extent of discrepancy
between an individual's progress toward a goal and her or his expected rate of progress.
p.141 Although it can be said that people cope with life events, coping is primarily a
response to the emotions, particularly negative emotions, elicited by these events. This is because the
meaningfulness of external events is, to a large extent, a function of their ability to arouse emotion.
p.147 The experience of stressors is an unavoidable part of life. However, individuals differ substantially
in how they respond to these stressors.
p.173 The optimist remains resilient because her cognitive skills lead her to find and exert control
whenever and wherever possible, but always "to the degree that reality permits"
p.249 Mastery-oriented thinking, in contrast, revolves around the task at hand and focuses on effort and
strategies. Mastery-oriented students think about how to accomplish something, not about whether they're smart or not. For
them, effort is the way to put their skills into motion, to surmount challenges, to accomplish their goals, and to increase
their abilities.
p.249-250 Resilience in the face of challenge and setbacks is a highly valued attribute - one sometimes
treated as some mysterious gift of nature. The coping styles we have described are, at bottom, resilient and nonresilient
ways of responding to challenge... if we emphasize development and focus on those aspects of achievement over which
the child has control, such as effort and strategy, we enhance the development of resilient, mastery-oriented coping.
p.324 The very goals we set for ourselves will be influenced, in part, by our coping armamentarium.
p.329 Wherever people encounter stressors, coping can be studied.