The “Morals of Chess” by Benjamin Franklin
Following is the text of Franklin’s famous essay, submitted
by Franklin himself to the Columbian Magazine, which published it in the December 1786 issue. It is taken from the
Hagedorn reference given as (1) in the reference list of this paper.
There was a slightly different version of it, with various minor
wording changes, published in book form the following year. There are references to a 1779 and 1780 printing of the essay,
but to this writer’s knowledge no copy of either such supposed printing has been located.
To the Editor of The Columbian Magazine
Sir,
Playing at Chess, is the most ancient and the most universal game
known among men; for its original is beyond the memory of history, and it has, for numberless ages, been the amusement of
all the civilized nations of Asia, the Persians, the Indians, and the Chinese. Europe has had it above 1000 years; the Spaniards
have spread it over their part of America, and it begins lately to make its appearance in these northern states. It is so
interesting in itself, as not to need the view of gain to induce engaging in it; and thence it is never played for money.
Those, therefore, who have leisure for such diversions, cannot find one that is more innocent; and the following piece,
written with a view to correct ( among a few young friends) some little improprieties in the practice of it, shows at the
same time that it may, in its effects on the mind, be not merely innocent, but advantageous, to the vanquished
as well as to the victor.
The Morals of Chess
The game of Chess is not merely an idle amusement. Several very
valuable qualities of the mind, useful in the course of human life, are to be acquired or strengthened by it, so as to become
habits, ready on all occasions. For life is a kind of chess, in which we have often points to gain, and competitors or adversaries
to contend with, and in which there is a vast variety of good and ill events, that are, in some degree, the effects of prudence
or the want of it. By playing at chess, then, we may learn:
1. Foresight, which looks a little into futurity, and considers
the consequences that may attend to an action: for it is continually occurring to the player, “If I move this piece,
what will be the advantages of my new situation? What use can my adversary make of it to annoy me? What other moves can I
make to support it, and to defend myself from his attacks? “
2. Circumspection, which surveys the whole chess-board,
or scene of action, the relations of the several pieces and situations, the dangers they are respectively exposed to, the
several possibilities of their aiding each other; the probabilities that the adversary may make this or that move, and attack
this or the other piece; and what different means can be used to avoid his stroke, or turn its consequences against him.
3. Caution, not to make our moves too hastily. This habit
is best acquired by observing strictly the laws of the game, such as, If you touch a piece, you must move it somewhere;
if you set it down, you must let it stand. And it is therefore best that these rules should be observed, as the game thereby
becomes more the image of human life, and particularly of war; in which, if you have incautiously put yourself into a bad
and dangerous position, you cannot obtain your enemy’s leave to withdraw your troops, and place them more securely;
but you must abide by all the consequences of your rashness.
And lastly, we learn by chess the habit of not being discouraged
by present bad appearances in the state of our affairs, the habit of hoping for a favorable change, and
that of persevering in the search of resources. The game is so full of events, there is such a variety of turns in
it, the fortune of it is so subject to sudden vicissitudes, and one so frequently, after long contemplation, discovers the
means of extricating one’s self from a supposed insurmountable difficulty, that one is encouraged to continue the contest
to the last, in hopes of victory by our own skill, or, at least, of giving a stale mate, by the negligence of our adversary.
And whoever considers, what in chess he often sees instances of, that particular pieces of success are apt to produce presumption,
and its consequent, inattention, by which more is afterwards lost than was gained by the preceding advantage; while misfortunes
produce more care and attention, by which the loss may be recovered, will learn not to be too much discouraged by the present
success of his adversary, nor to despair of final good fortune, upon every little check he receives in the pursuit of it.
That we may, therefore, be induced more frequently to chuse this
beneficial amusement, in preference to others which are not attended with the same advantages, every circumstance, that may
increase the pleasure of it, should be regarded; and every action or word that is unfair, disrespectful, or that in any way
may give uneasiness, should be avoided, as contrary to the immediate intention of both the players, which is, to pass the
time agreeably.
Therefore 1st. If it is agreed to play according the strict rules,
then those rules are to be exactly observed by both parties; and should not be insisted on for one side, while deviated from
by the other; for this is not equitable.
2. If it is agreed not to observe the rules exactly, but one party
demands indulgences, he should be as willing to allow them to the other.
3. No false move should ever be made to extricate yourself out
of a difficulty, or to gain advantage. There can be no pleasure in playing with a person once detected in such unfair practice.
4. If your adversary is long in playing, you ought not to hurry
him, or express any uneasiness at his delay. You should not sing, or whistle, nor look at your watch, nor take up a book to
read, nor make a tapping with your feet on the floor, or with your fingers on the table, nor do any thing that may disturb
his attention. For all these things displease. And they do not show in playing, but your craftiness or your rudeness.
5. You ought not to endeavour to amuse and deceive your adversary,
by pretending to have made bad moves, and saying you have now lost the game, in order to make him secure and careless, and
inattentive to your schemes; for this is fraud, and deceit, not skill at the game.
6. You must not, when you have gained a victory, use any triumphing
or insulting expression, nor show too much pleasure; but endeavour to console your adversary, and make him less dissatisfied
with himself by every kind and civil expression, that may be used with truth; such as, You understand the game better than
I, but you are a little inattentive; or, You play too fast; or, You had the best of the game, but something happened to divert
your thoughts, and that turned it in my favour.
7. If you are a spectator, while others play, observe the most
perfect silence. For if you give advice, you offend both parties; him, against whom you may give it, because it may cause
the loss of his game; him, in whose favour you give it, because, tho’ it may be good, and he follows it, he loses the
pleasure he might have had, if you had permitted him to think till it occurred to himself. Even after a move or moves, you
must not, by replacing the pieces, show how it might have been played better: for that displeases, and may occasion disputes
or doubts about their true situation. All talking to the players, lessens or diverts their attention, and is therefore displeasing;
nor should you give the least hint to either party, by any kind of noise or motion. – If you do, you are unworthy to
be a spectator.-If you have a mind to exercise or show your judgment, do it in playing your own game when you have an opportunity,
not in criticizing or meddling with, or counseling, the play of others.
Lastly. If the game is not to be played rigorously, according
to the rules above mentioned, then moderate your desire of victory over your adversary, and be pleased with one over yourself.
Snatch not eagerly at every advantage offered by his unskillfulness or inattention; but point out to him kindly that by such
a move he places or leaves a piece in danger and unsupported; that by another he will put his king in a dangerous situation,
&c. By this generous civility (so opposite to the unfairness above forbidden) you may indeed happen to lose the game to
your opponent, but you will win what is better, his esteem, his respect, and his affection; together with the silent approbation
and good will of impartial spectators.