John L Jerz Website II Copyright (c) 2013

Cognitive Effects on Bodily Functioning (Schachter, 1967)
Home
Current Interest
Page Title

In: David C. Glass, Neurophysiology and Emotion, 1967, p.117-144

Weick (1969, The Social Psychology of Organizing, p.64) cites this work as one source of his enactment concept. Weick did not cite page numbers, only the work itself. What could he have found useful here? Perhaps he instead read one the two commentary essays that followed, and adopted their conclusions:

"The tendency to look for a simple stimulus response pattern in our understanding of behavior is gradually being abandoned. The organism cannot be separated from its environment"

"Correct or incorrect perception of body states is the foundation for much of human behavior."

p.123-124 Given a state of physiological arousal for which a subject has no easy explanation, he proves readily manipulable into the disparate states of euphoria and anger. Given an identical physiological state for which the subject has an appropriate explanation, his mood is almost untouched by the rigged situation.
 Such results are not limited to the states of anger and euphoria... we have been readily able to manipulate uninformed epinephrine subjects into amusement... and into fearful or anxious states.

p.132-133 in the work described so far, there is nothing that we have been able to do - from feeding to frightening to injecting with adrenalin - that has any effect on the eating behavior of the obese subject or that fails to have an effect on the eating behavior of the normal subject.

p.136 there is growing reason to suspect that the eating behavior of the obese is relatively unrelated to any internal gut state but is, in large part, under external control; that is, eating behavior is initiated and terminated by stimuli external to the organism.

p.144 The physiological correlates of food deprivation may or may not be associated with "hunger," may or may not be associated with eating. Explicitly abandoning the assumption of identity has for "hunger" proved experimentally worthwhile. I suspect that doing so for many of the other feeling states that are presumably physiological well-anchored may prove equally rewarding.

JLJ - Schachter's paper above was presented at a conference, and was followed by two papers based in part on the results of Schachter's work:

[Marvin Stein - Some Psychophysiological Considerations]

p.154 The tendency to look for a simple stimulus response pattern in our understanding of behavior is gradually being abandoned. The organism cannot be separated from its environment, and upon closer examination, the distinction becomes nebulous. Dr. Schachter's presentation further emphasizes the importance of terminating the search for the cause and directing our energies toward a complete description of the organism in its environment, and the nature and the processes involved in behavior.

[Norman Scotch - Inside Every Fat Man]

p.157 In a sense, Dr. Schachter is telling us that there is no such thing as a "true body state." ...For a long time, anthropologists have been pointing out that there is no such thing as a "true physical environment," and that the habitat of a social group is perceived according to the culture of that group.

p.159 The perception of body state is as much a function of social group membership as it is of personality factors... In turn, that perception affects in important ways what we do about it.

p.159 If it is true that perception is one of the first "acts" in a chain of acts, and that is it as pivotal an act as it appears, there are a number of important implications to be derived from Dr. Schachter's findings. Correct or incorrect perception of body states is the foundation for much of human behavior.
 If a person perceives himself as being healthy when in fact he is ill, he might well act in ways that might hasten his death... On the other hand, if a person perceives himself as ill when he is well, there is an obvious loss of effectiveness in terms of "healthy" participation in day-to-day living.