John L Jerz Website II Copyright (c) 2014

Defining and Classifying Clinical Indicators for Quality Improvement (Mainz, 2003)

Home
Current Interest
Page Title

Jan Mainz

Oxford Journals/Medicine/Int. Journal for Quality in Health Care/Volume 15/Issue 6 p.523-530

http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/6/523.full.pdf

"This paper provides a brief review of definitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care."

"Conclusions. Monitoring health care quality is impossible without the use of clinical indicators. They create the basis for quality improvement and prioritization in the health care system. To ensure that reliable and valid clinical indicators are used, they must be designed, defined, and implemented with scientific rigour."

p.523 Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality improvement, or sentinel, identifying incidents of care that trigger further investigation. They can assess aspects of the structure, process, or outcome of health care. Furthermore, indicators can be generic measures that are relevant for most patients or disease-specific, expressing the quality of care for patients with specific diagnoses.

p.524 Indicators have been defined in several different ways:

  1. As measures that assess a particular health care process or outcome.
  2. As quantitative measures that can be used to monitor and evaluate the quality of important governance, management, clinical, and support functions that affect patient outcomes.
  3. As measurement tools, screens, or flags that are used as guides to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of patient care, clinical support services, and organizational function that affect patient outcomes.
Indicators provide a quantitative basis for clinicians, organizations, and planners aiming to achieve improvement in care and the processes by which patient care is provided.

p.524 An ideal indicator would have the following key characteristics: (i) indicator is based on agreed definitions, and described exhaustively and exclusively; (ii) indicator is highly or optimally specific and sensitive, i.e. it detects few false positives and false negatives; (iii) indicator is valid and reliable; (iv) indicator discriminates well; (v) indicator relates to clearly identifiable events for the user (e.g. if meant for clinical providers, it is relevant to clinical practice); (vi) indicator permits useful comparisons; and (vii) indicator is evidence-based. Each indicator must be defined in detail, with explicit data specifications in order to be specific and sensitive.

p.524-525 A rate-based indicator uses data about events that are expected to occur with some frequency. These can be expressed as proportions or rates (proportions within a given time period), ratios, or mean values for a sample population. To permit comparisons among providers or trends over time, proportion- or rate-based indicators need both a numerator and a denominator specifying the population at risk for an event and the period of time over which the event may take place.
 A sentinel indicator identifies individual events or phenomena that are intrinsically undesirable, and always trigger further analysis and investigation. Each incident would trigger an investigation. Sentinel events represent the extreme of poor performance and they are generally used for risk management.