p.47 books are largely made from other books
p.50 But what, then, are the sources of our knowledge? The answer, I think, is this: there are all kinds of sources of our knowledge; but none has authority.
p.52 I propose to replace... the question of the sources of our knowledge by the entirely different question: 'How can we hope to detect and eliminate error?'
p.54 There are no ultimate sources of knowledge... every source, every suggestion, is open to critical examination.
p.55 Knowledge cannot start from nothing - from a tabula rasa - nor yet from observation. The advance of knowledge consists, mainly, in the modification of earlier knowledge. Although we may sometimes, for example in archaeology, advance through a chance observation, the significance of the discovery will usually depend upon its power to modify our earlier theories.
p.55 Neither observation nor reason is an authority.
p.55 Every solution of a problem raises new unsolved problems
p.57 What we should do, I suggest, is to give up the idea of ultimate sources of knowledge, and admit that all human knowledge is human: that it is mixed with our errors, our prejudices, our dreams, and our hopes: that all we can do is to grope for truth even though it be beyond our reach.
|