Donald Sull, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
Another take at simple rules: http://johnljerz.com/superduper/tlxdownloadsiteWEBSITEII/id389.html
JLJ - The problem with truly "simple rules" is that we are very capable of noticing, then processing richly detailed and complex information cues in our environment. There might be situations where using a "complex rule" works better (performance wise) than a "simple rule", and which we can apply with ease and without thinking.
Consider: an NFL quarterback reading defenses. A linebacker notices that an offensive lineman is leaning back in his stance, suggesting a blocking pattern typical for a passing play. A major league baseball player at bat against a pitcher who is giving away subtle cues as to which pitch he is throwing. A runner taking a lead off of first base, subconsciously bending his knees in the pause before he takes off to steal second base. A poker player taking several seconds longer than usual to place his bet. And so on.
The point: an opponent who knows you are using simple rules might have the advantage he needs to defeat you. Now what?
It seems that "simple rules" can work when they are part of an effective system. But the "system" might call for more complex rules, at certain times.
Practical, performance based, and richly detailed cues, which can be processed automatically through years of practice and effort, might just put "simple rules" out to pasture. But first let's see what Sull and Eisenhardt have to say.
|