Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

The 21st Century Security Environment and the Future of War (Gray, 2008)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

 
In: Parameters, Winter 2008-09
 
"Strategy is really all about..."
 
Mr. Gray's thoughts are worth their weight in gold. (What does a thought weigh?)

p.14 beware of the pretentiously huge idea that purports to explain what everybody else, supposedly, has been too dumb to grasp... New-sounding terms and phrases, advanced by highly persuasive people with apparently solid credentials, can usually find a ready audience.
 
p.15 Alas, the facts are that the future has not happened, and no amount of planning can make it visible to our gaze today.
 
p.15 The future is not foreseeable, at least not in a very useful sense. The challenge is to cope with uncertainty, not try to diminish it. That cannot be done reliably. Such ill-fated attempts will place us on the road to ruin through the creation of unsound expectations.
 
p.16 Recall a few of the golden rules of defense planning: (1) Try to make small mistakes rather than big ones; (2) be adaptable and flexible so that you cope with the troubles your mistakes will certainly give you; (3) aim to have only minimal regrets in the future.
 
p.16 flexibility and adaptability... are often the basis for defense planning when the time, place, and identity of enemies are unknown, or at least uncertain.
 
p.16-17 Expect to be surprised. To win as a defense planner is not to avoid surprise. To win is to have planned in such a manner that the effects of surprise do not inflict lethal damage. The fundamental reason why we can be surprised tends... to be... the consequences of known trends that interact in unexpected ways, resulting in unanticipated consequences.
 
p.17 Complexity denies us the ability to predict reliably, so we need a strategy to cope with complexity, not try to eliminate it. [note to self: put in current paper]
 
p.17 If we do not understand war after 2,500 years, when will we do so?
 
p.18 What is most essential for understanding war and strategy is to maintain the clear conceptual distinction between war and strategy, singular, and wars and strategies, plural.
 
p.18 the further into the future you try to peer, the fuzzier the picture becomes.
 
p.19 We will certainly be surprised in the future, so it is our task now to try to plan against the effects of some deeply unsettling surprises. The key to victory here is not the expensive creation of new conceptual, methodological, or electro-mechanical tools of prediction. Rather it is to pursue defense and security planning on the principles of minimum regrets and considerable flexibility and adaptability.
 
p.25 Trends and perils come in bundles and interact with nonlinear consequences... The future is unpredictable, and our present security condition may well become a great deal worse than it is today.

Enter supporting content here