p.52 Another significant characteristic of the structure of consciousness is its partly tacit nature. Indeed,
Michael Polanyi (1958) suggested that tacit knowing is more fundamental than explicit knowing: "We
can know more than we can tell and we can tell nothing without relying on our awareness of things we may not be able to tell"
(p.x). Polanyi elaborates on this assertion, which runs counter to the logic of scientific-analysis mind-set, by distinguishing
between focal and subsidiary awareness. Skilled wielders of paintbrushes, brooms, or indeed, any tool, have as their focal
point of awareness the tip of the implement. Yet it is the complex movements of their hands, of which they are only aware
in a subsidiary way, that actually guide the tool.
p.137 As he stressed in the foreword to his last major study, Human Systems are Different (Vickers,
1983):
The essence of systems thinking, as I understand it, is the concept of form or order, sustained
through time by a self-correcting process, that notices deviations from the standards which define order and responds
with actions which sustain or restore it (p.vii)... To a mind accustomed to systems thinking, time is an ever present
dimension, and the preservation of order through time is the basic problem both in understanding the past and
in influencing the future [italics added]. Stability, even more than change, demands to be explained, aspired
to and regulated (p.viii)
p.137 "human societies survive only so long as they can resolve or contain the conflicts
which they generate" (Open Systems Group, 1984, p.177)
p.138 The mark of a successful individual or a successful society is that it manages to
sustain through time a host of different relationships, keeping each in accord with some standard of expectation,
while containing all within the resources available; and developing all these standards in the process ([Open Systems
Group, 1984,] p.180)
|