Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Future Scanning (Beckham, 1997)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

 
Originally published in Health Forum Journal
 
"it's foolhardy to assume you can control the future. The future will consist of powerful flows that, like the weather, can be leveraged and ridden but can never be controlled. Trips to the future begin with a struggle to see and understand these powerful currents: their general direction, their power, and where they may collide and coalesce."

p.1 Making predictions is easy... making correct predictions is exceedingly hard... If an organization can more effectively imagine the future, then it obviously has an enormous advantage.
  The future may be uncertain, but it is not a complete crapshoot... the odds ought to be good that you can beat the house... what we once regarded as random occurrences in our physical environment are really the result of systematic and potentially predictable forces.
 
p.2 Chaos theory... One of its lessons is that small things can have big future impacts often impossible to fully appreciate until they've been played out. In chaos theory, the big impact of little things is called "sensitivity to initial conditions."
 
p.2 It would be impossible to try to anticipate the emergence of the infinite number of small things that might have big impacts. Things are just too complex and tightly woven. After all, it is the large, transforming consequences you need to be ready to ride. It's the avalanche that's dangerous, not the single snowflake that may ultimately set it off.
 
p.2 Physician, Hans Selye, put it this way in his advice to young people at the beginning of their careers: "Try to look for the mere outlines of big things with your fresh, untrained, and unprejudiced mind." That's also good advice for organizations planning their careers in the future.
 
p.3 A vision involves imagining a point in the future, then reverse engineering by asking, "What must we do in the present to become our future?" As you undertake actions designed to realize your vision, the future starts to dictate the present... Foresight is not enough. Foresight implies a certain level of passivity - a willingness to react to the future. This is better than ignoring the future. But more powerful still is an "anticipative shaping" that seeks to discern not only the powerful currents of the future but also how those currents can be leveraged. The challenge is not only to anticipate the future but to wrestle with it in the present then make it your own.

But it's foolhardy to assume you can control the future. The future will consist of powerful flows that, like the weather, can be leveraged and ridden but can never be controlled. Trips to the future begin with a struggle to see and understand these powerful currents: their general direction, their power, and where they may collide and coalesce. It is these forces that determine how the beaches of the present will be eroded by the floods of the future.

p.4 It takes a youthful mind to do this. To back off and see things whole. To not be dragged into the muck and mire by the gravity of details.

p.8 Run with the scissors. One of my favorite T-shirt slogans is "Runs with scissors." It labels an obvious violator of life's protocols. Be reckless in your thinking. Imagine inventing a future that would rip the guts out of the organization - that would slaughter every sacred and semi-sacred cow. Boldness is liberating. So is audacity and heresy. Without them, the organization can become subject to the tyranny of the incremental as it chants the mantra: "It worked in the past. It works in the present. We need only do it better in the future."

p.8 To avoid being trapped by too narrow or too rigid a set of assumptions, deliberately and repeatedly attack assumptions... By routinely asking, "Why?" five times, higher levels of understanding are created... there's no way to create the future without action in the present. And the best way to allocate focus and resources in the present is against some rational concept of the future.

Enter supporting content here