Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Pattern Formation in the Physical and Biological Sciences (Nijhout, Nadel, Stein, 1997)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

NijoutPFITPABS.jpg

This volume contains the best lectures from the Summer School Lectures volumes dealing with the theme of pattern formation. Topics include self-organization by simulated evolution, nonlinear dynamics of pattern formation in physics and biology, and the emergence of computational ecologies.

p.3 The starting point in most models of physical pattern formation is a set of equations of motion for which a uniform solution is assumed to exist. The equations can be realistic descriptions of the system in question, or a mathematical model chosen because its solutions mimic the behavior of the system one wishes to study.
 
p.9-10 we would like to know which simplifying assumptions are safe to make without losing the essence of the process, and which simplifying assumptions lead to a model of little biological relevance... The model should, of course, incorporate as much biological information as possible.
 
p.10 Perhaps the most important thing that should be required of a model is not that it reproduces a pattern faithfully, but that with small quantitative changes in parameters values, it can produce the evolutionary diversity present in that pattern, and the effects of perturbation experiments and mutations on the pattern... Finally, a model should not only produce the final pattern but mimic in its time evolution the succession of patterns seen during ontogeny of the system.
 
p.14 Learning requires some level of a priori knowledge about the task to be learned
 
p.190 the evolution of life as well as natural selection can also be modeled by complex dynamical systems with fixed rules, although this modeling will be extremely difficult
 
p.190 we need two sets of dynamical systems: at the higher level, there is a dynamics of the rules, and at the lower level, there is a dynamics of the entities. Many evolutionary models are of such nature. The complexity of the system results from the interplay between higher-level and lower-level dynamics.
 
p.192 Besides the dynamical rule, the wiring diagram of a network also plays an important role in determining the dynamics.
 
p.290 In simulation the theoretical model grasps and accurately summarizes the principles behind the process being simulated, while in mimicry the model is wrong even though it produces the right kind of pattern... Unfortunately, much modeling in theoretical developmental biology appears at present to be mimicry.
 
p.291 In order to have a reasonable assurance that a model has captured the essence of a process, it must produce a pattern whose details resemble those of the morphology being modeled, it must also reproduce in its dynamics reasonable portions of the ontogenetic transformation that the real pattern undergoes... it must be able to produce... a range of diversity of the pattern identical to that found to occur in nature. Few models meet these expectations.
 
p.350 To make a forecast if the [underlying deterministic] equations are not known, one must find both the rules governing system evolution and the actual state of the system... the goal of modeling is to find a description that accurately captures features of the long-term behavior of the system.

Enter supporting content here