Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society? (Flyvbjerg, 1998)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

 
British Journal of Sociology Volume 49 Issue 2 June 1998

p.219 If our goal is to move toward... freedom from domination... then our first task is... to understand the realities of power. Here we turn to the work of Michel Foucault, who has tried to develop such an understanding.
 
p.227 Foucault focuses his efforts on the local and context-dependent and toward the analysis of strategies and tactics as basis for power struggle.
 
p.228 The value of Foucault's approach is his emphasis on the dynamics of power. Understanding how power works is the first prerequisite for action, because action is the exercise of power. And such an understanding can best be achieved by focusing on the concrete.
 
p.229 A strong civil society guarantees the existence of conflict. A strong understanding of civil society, and of democracy, must therefore be based on thought that places conflict and power at its center, as Foucault does and Habermas does not.

Enter supporting content here