p.2 In the Enlightenment tradition, rationality is typically seen as a concept
that is well-defined and context-independent. We know what rationality is, and rationality is supposed to be constant over
time and place. This study, however, demonstrates that rationality is context-dependent and that the context of rationality
is power.
p.6 Most important - and this I take to be the main contribution of Nietzsche
and Foucault to the study of power and modernity - knowledge and power, truth and power, rationality and power are
seen as analytically and politically inseparable, leaving the actual relationship between these phenomena open to
empirical test.
p.3 Nietzsche and Foucault... are practical thinkers of power.
p.27 The rationality produced is actively formed by the power relations... Conversely, these power relations
are supported by the rationality generated.
p.28 Power Defines Reality
p.141 In an open confrontation, actions are dictated by whatever works best to defeat the opponent.
p.182 Again we are reminded of Nietzsche's dictum, "Knowledge kills action; action
requires the veils of illusion."
p.192 Rationality Needs Stability
p.206 Repetition is reality, and it is the seriousness of life. Soren Kirkegaard
p.227 power defines what counts as rationality and knowledge and thereby what counts as
reality... power defines, and creates, concrete physical, economic, ecological, and social realities.
p.231 Power relations are constantly changing. They demand constant maintenance,
cultivation, and reproduction.