Copyright (c) 2012 John L. Jerz

On the Parallel Between Learning and Evolution (Pringle, 1951)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

J. W. S. Pringle
Department of Zoology, Cambridge
 
Behaviour, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1951), pp. 174-215
 
The main thesis of this article is that there is a parallel between the process of organic evolution and the process of learning, and the basis of the argument is the unique kinematic nature of the process which results in a selection of variations.

p.177-178 The type of process through which an increase in complexity occurs in living organisms is known in one form as the natural selection of random variations, widely accepted as the chief mechanism of evolution. To bring it into its correct relationship to the second law of thermodynamics, this process should more accurately be described as the selection of improbable variations, the term "improbable" being used in its statistical sense... The selection which occurs in evolution... A means is present of preserving in the system the effect of certain transformations which are improbable and of ignoring the effect of other transformations, including the reverse transformation to that which is preserved.
 
p.182 We must now turn to examine the types of learning shown by animals and enquire if there are any features which demand the existence here also of an "evolutionary" process.
 
p.183 The third type of learning is classed by Thorpe as trial-and-error learning. Essentially, the animal makes more-or-less random movements and selects, in the sense that it subsequently repeats, those which produce the "desired" result; namely, those which lead to the correct conditions for the release of a further response.
 
p.186 To justify our hypothesis in its application to the phenomenon of learning it is necessary to suggest a type of mechanism, consistent with what is known about the physiology of the central nervous system, which is capable of performing a selection of variation in time in a manner analogous to the natural selection of variation in form found in organic evolution.
 
p.194 The main thesis of this article is that there is a parallel between the process of organic evolution and the process of learning, and the basis of the argument is the unique kinematic nature of the process which results in a selection of variations.
 
p.211 It is suggested that the most general feature of learning is the increase in complexity of behaviour which results.
 
p.211-212 Evolution by natural selection of random variations is the best known example of this type of process [evolutionary]... it is suggested that learning is [another] example.

Enter supporting content here