Copyright (c) 2012 John L. Jerz

The Organization of Behavior (Hebb, 1949)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

A Neuropsychological Theory

xi It might be argued that the task of the psychologist, the task of understanding behavior and reducing the vagaries of human thought to a mechanical process of cause and effect, is a more difficult one than that of any other scientist
 
p.92 Now it happens that the visual activity of lower species is dominated by the perception of place. This turns out experimentally to mean a dominance of cues from remote objects instead of near ones, and remote objects provide the most stable and constant stimulation of the animal's environment.
 
p.92-93 When visual cues from the distant environment are available, they dominate behavior.
 
p.141 At a theoretical level, it seems further that there can be no explanation of learning and problem-solving in any mammal without reference to the persisting central neural influence that sustains activity in one particular direction.
 
p.240 We have deliberately got rid of any criterion of emotion except that it "arouses, sustains, and directs" behavior.
 
p.256 Observe further the conditions in which the adaptive behavior of adult emotion occurs. Apart from the spinal reflexes aroused by noxious stimulation, a fully coordinated emotional response appears always to be a response to premonitory cues, not in themselves disruptive, but associated with disruptive stimulation.
 
p.256 If the adaptive behavior of fear (that is, avoidance) is indeed a response to events that are not directly disruptive but premonitory cues associated with disruption, the behavior is by definition a learned response. It is then intelligible why there is usually less emotional activity at maturity. As experience increases, rage and fear would tend to disappear in the familiar environment, for the utilization of premonitory cues, to avoid disturbance that is foreseen but not yet in existence, would become more and more efficient.

Enter supporting content here